A barber shop quartet, four of them, singing in unison, spring birds at a feeder, early morning sparrows at a jug of milk, abandoned by the milkman on the doorstep.
Except they were none of that. How could they be? They were four brothers, torn apart at birth. They never knew each other, never sang together, never embraced each other, never held each other in their arms. How could they have done so? The first one was stillborn. The second one survived for a while, but struggled to live, succumbed, and drifted away. The third one lived, marked for life by the scars on his forehead where they dragged him from the womb. The fourth one stopped struggling in the seventh month, but the mother carried him to term, even though she knew he was dead.
She carried them, blessed them, gave them all names, and buried three of them. They were her babies and she never got over their loss. Oh, she survived physically, but mentally she was destroyed.
The priests wanted to know what sins she had committed for God to be so angry with her that He destroyed the fruit of her womb. She had no answer. Some refused to bless her. Others ignored her completely. A few used her sorrows to drag the survivor into the tangled web of the church. “He has been spared. He will be one of us,” they said, and rejoiced at the potential strengthening of their celibate ranks.
Three of her children were ever before her. But the fourth lodged like an albatross on her shoulders and hung like a crucifix round her neck. She could never see him clearly. How could she? He was rarely before her eyes, never in the range of her sight. She tried to mold him like putty, but like water or sand, he slipped through her fingers.
Her husband hated him. Was he the father? It’s a wise man knows his father, or his son. Yet they looked alike. But no, they never thought alike, or walked alike. Nor moved in the same circles.
The father, a gambler, had borrowed a large sum of money and placed it with a bookie, betting that this third son would never live and that his death would make his father’s fortune, if the child was indeed a product of the seed his father deposited in his wife’s child bank.
The father lost his bet. The son lived. The father hated him every day of his life. A rich man he would have been, if … if only … and the scars of that lost bet raged ragged on his face as the father cursed the doctor who had pulled his son, if he was his son, alive and struggling from the womb.
If he was his son … a strong man, magnificently muscled , it was not his fault, never his fault, it was the fault of that worthless woman, the woman who had carried his seed, if it was his seed, the woman who carried his other three sons, and never brought them alive into this world …
The ostrich sees danger, and buries his head in the sand. The son sees danger and learns to run. The wife sees danger and learns to suffer, to be beaten, to be abused, to be the victim because yes, she is filled with guilt, and how could it be otherwise, when the spirit is willing and the flesh is weak, so weak that it cannot give birth and eventually takes to the black holes of victimization, of alcoholism, and eventually of oblivion.
And the son learned to hide, to make himself invisible, never to be there, never to accept responsibility, never to sit at the desk when the buck was about to stop anywhere nearby, never to be blamed … never to turn down the solace to be found in the darkest depths of those same bottles that finally destroyed the woman he loved, who was also his mother.
Next time, show don’t tell.
6 thoughts on “Show Don’t Tell”
Hey rogerdear!!have you closed to write poem?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Still writing poems, but I can’t submit them for competitions etc if I publish them on the web. So I concentrate on drawings and prose pieces. The poems I reserve for other things.
Okay,it is better way.dear roger!!but i liked so much your poems.😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I’ll start putting some up again. I certainly have many!!!
What could you ‘show’? I liked the ‘tell’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess it’s my response to the often chanted mantra ‘show don’t tell’, a formulaic response that shuts down all discussion and destroys the roots of story-telling in favor of story-showing. I have seen it used mindlessly by writing experts who didn’t know how to analyse what they were reading and who fell back on that particular chant to save their skins and their precious reputations. Many stories can be ‘shown’, some need to be told, in the traditional fashion … “Once upon a time, a long time ago …”